Different demographic responses of three species of container Aedes (Diptera: Culicidae) larvae to timing of extrinsic mortality.

Mortality imposed on a population can interact with negatively density-dependent mortality to produce overcompensation, wherein added mortality results in more survivors. Experimental mortality can cause overcompensation in mosquito larvae, which would be counterproductive if it resulted from mosquito control in nature. We tested for different demographic responses to mortality among 3 container Aedes species when impacted by density dependence. We imposed 48.2% mortality on cohorts of larvae 2, 6, or 8 days after hatching and compared adult production, development times, and female size to those variables for controls without mortality. Mortality significantly increased adult production compared to controls, but the 3 species varied in the details of that response. Aedes albopictus (Skuse) produced more adults with mortality on day 2 primarily because of greater production of males. Aedes triseriatus (Say) yielded more adults with mortality on day 2 primarily because of greater production of females. Aedes aegypti (L.) adult production was not significantly affected by mortality, but development times for both sexes were significantly shorter with mortality on day 8. There were no effects of mortality on female wing length. None of our mortality treatments yielded significant reductions of adults for any species. These species responses to mortality are not the same, despite their similar ecologies and life histories. Thus, we cannot assume that killing almost half the larvae present in a dense population will reduce adult production, nor can we assume that different Aedes species will respond to mortality in the same way.

Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant for the Treatment of Macular Edema and Uveitis: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.

Purpose: The purpose of this review article is to provide a comprehensive review of the current applications of intravitreal DEX implant (Ozurdex®, Allergan Inc, Irvine, CA) for a variety of ophthalmic conditions - ranging from FDA approved indications to off-label uses. We have attempted to provide relevant evidence from the literature to help a reader develop an understanding of the biological and pharmacokinetic properties of DEX implant, its uses, and potential side effects. Methods: PubMed searches were performed using the terms "Ozurdex", or "intravitreal DEX implant", AND "retinal vein occlusion", or "diabetic macular edema", or "uveitis". The search was performed in July of 2021, with an additional search in October 2021. All original English language articles were considered for this review. Results: DEX implant has evidence of efficacy in a variety of clinical situations including macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion, diabetes, uveitis, and others. Safety concerns include cataract formation and progression, intraocular pressure elevation, complications related to intravitreal injection, and opportunistic infections secondary to steroid-induced immune suppression. Conclusion: DEX implant is a useful tool in the management of several retinal disorders. Further studies are needed for head-to-head comparison with other treatment modalities and to determine its precise place in clinical practice.

Survival-Larval Density Relationships in the Field and Their Implications for Control of Container-Dwelling Aedes Mosquitoes.

Population density can affect survival, growth, development time, and adult size and fecundity, which are collectively known as density-dependent effects. Container Aedes larvae often attain high densities in nature, and those densities may be reduced when larval control is applied. We tested the hypothesis that density-dependent effects on survival are common and strong in nature and could result in maximal adult production at intermediate densities for Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus, and Aedes triseriatus. We surveyed naturally occurring densities in field containers, then introduced larvae at a similar range of densities, and censused the containers for survivors. We analyzed the survival-density relationships by nonlinear regressions, which showed that survival-density relationships vary among seasons, sites, and species. For each Aedes species, some sites and times yielded predictions that larval density reduction would yield the same (compensation), or more (overcompensation), adults than no larval density reduction. Thus, larval control targeting these Aedes species cannot always be assumed to yield a reduction in the number of adult mosquitoes. We suggest that mosquito control targeting larvae may be made more effective by: Imposing maximum mortality; targeting populations when larval abundances are low; and knowing the shape of the survival-density response of the target population.